Holey Theory raises profound philosophical questions about free will, the soul, trauma, and meaning. This in-depth article answers the most common objections and inquiries, clarifying how trauma disrupts coherence, how healing restores agency, and why meaning emerges through integration rather than suffering itself.
Philosophy
Philosophical Questions Raised by Holey Theory
Holey Theory invites philosophical objection precisely because it crosses disciplinary boundaries. This counterpoint article examines the strongest critiques (entropy misuse, metaphysical excess, threats to free will, and romanticization of suffering) and demonstrates why the model remains conceptually coherent, ethically grounded, and philosophically defensible.
The Philosophical Implications of Holey Theory
Holey Theory reframes trauma as an entropic rupture within the self-system and healing as a negentropic process of reintegration. This philosophical model challenges traditional views of free will, suffering, and the soul, offering a trauma-informed framework in which agency expands with coherence, meaning emerges through integration, and the soul functions as an organizing attractor rather than a damaged essence.
Disclaimer: I am not a licensed therapist or mental health professional. I am a trauma survivor. If you need help, please seek the services of a licensed professional (see my Resources Page for suggestions). The contents of this website are for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Information on this page might not be accurate or up-to-date. Accordingly, this page should not be used as a diagnosis of any medical illness, mental or physical. This page is also not a substitute for professional counseling, therapy, or any other type of medical advice. Some topics discussed on this website could be upsetting. If you are triggered by this website’s content you should seek the services of a trained and licensed professional.